Category: Research Methods and Statistics
Balaskas, A., Schueller, S. M., Cox, A. L., & Doherty, G. (2021). Ecological momentary interventions for mental health: A scoping review. PloS one, 16(3), e0248152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248152
, ,Qingqing Yin, M.S. (she/her/hers)
Graduate student
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
Chelsey Wilks, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Meta
St. Louis, Missouri
John Kellerman, M.S. (he/him/his)
PhD Student
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
María Larrazabal, MS (they/them/theirs)
Graduate Student
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia
Qingqing Yin, M.S. (she/her/hers)
Graduate student
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
Heather Schatten, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor (Research)
Butler Hospital & Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island
Heterogeneity in the nature of clinical presentations, prognostic possibilities, and individuals’ characteristics and preferences highlight the importance of delivering interventions that more precisely fit an individual’s needs (hereafter referred to as “precision care”; Bickman et al., 2016). In fact, tailoring evidence-based treatments into clinical practice has been a longstanding tradition in the field of clinical psychology (Paul, 1967). However, challenges remain in the personalized selection and implementation of interventions. For one, research that informs evidence-based treatments often prioritizes nomothetic (i.e., group-level) empirical findings from which population-level inferences are drawn rather than idiographic (i.e., individual-level) findings that are reflective of natural experiences (Molenaar & Campbell, 2009), making it difficult to directly translate research findings to personalized care. The same challenge applies to innovative forms of interventions (e.g., digital interventions) designed to facilitate broader dissemination of care, as we lack sufficient answers to questions including what intervention to provide, what targets to treat, and when an optimal timing of intervention is for a given individual.
Advanced quantitative methods coupled with intensive longitudinal individual-level data hold promise for guiding the delivery of “precision care” by more accurately modeling the dynamic needs of individuals (DeRubeis, 2019). In this talk, we present various attempts to identify optimal opportunities to provide clinical interventions and/or mental health resources. We will also discuss next steps towards ultimately providing care in the context where an individual would need and benefit from it.