Symposia
LGBTQ+
Laura Jans, M.A. (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York
Laura Jans, M.A. (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York
Sakura Ito, B.S.
Master's Student
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York
Eve A. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Podstdoctoral Fellow
National Center for PTSD
Menlo Park, California
Adam Gonzalez, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Director of Behavioral Health, Founding Director of the Mind-Body Clinical Research Center, Associate Professor of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York
Dina Vivian, PhD
Clinical Professor, Director of the KPC, Training Director of the Stony Brook University Consortium Programs
Stony Brook University, L. Krasner Psychological Center
Stony Brook, New York
Background: Individuals who identify as LGBTQ+ and a Person of Color (LGBTQ+/POC) experience multiple forms of oppression at the intersection of their identities, placing this community at higher risk for mental health difficulties. Further, LGBTQ+/POC report discrimination when accessing mental health services and lower quality of care overall. However, the literature on how to provide culturally-competent and affirming care for LGBTQ+/POC has yet to be synthesized.
Objective: The present study conducts a scoping review to assess the scope of literature and summarize the mental healthcare needs and experiences of LGBTQ+/POC in the United States.
Methods: An electronic search was conducted from January 2010 to May 2022 using the following databases with forward and backward citation searching: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycInfo and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. Inclusion criteria were: (1) perspectives from LGBTQ+/POC adults concerning the U.S. mental healthcare system and (2) relevant scope of content, including (a) mental healthcare experiences of LGBTQ+/POC, (b) evaluation of interventions for improving mental healthcare for LGBTQ+/POC, or (c) barriers to accessing mental healthcare for LGBTQ+/POC. Themes were identified using Braun & Clarke’s (2008) thematic analysis guidelines.
Results: Of the 786 texts identified, 19 were eligible for inclusion. The five emerging themes were (1) ideal provider competencies (e.g. avoiding over or under-emphasizing client identities), (2) provider identity factors (e.g. racial-ethnic identity, sexual orientation, gender), (3) structural barriers to mental health treatment (e.g. stigma, discrimination, cost), (4) factors facilitating treatment access (e.g. referrals from churches or LGBTQ+ organizations), and (5) stated system-level needs of the community (e.g. tailored services, support groups, paid community consultants to facilitate provider education).
Conclusions: The mental healthcare system severely underperforms in providing culturally competent and affirming care for LGBTQ+/POC. We identified and described current gaps in the literature (e.g., underrepresentation of specific LGBTQ+/POC subgroups) and provided recommendations to address these gaps in future research. Our hope is that this scoping review will inform an evidence-based provider training framework grounded in the perspectives, experiences, and stated needs of the LGBTQ+/POC community.