Symposia
Suicide and Self-Injury
Rebecca Fortgang, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Alexander Millner, Ph.D.
Research Associate
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Kelly Zuromski, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Research Associate
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Kate H. Bentley, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Clinical Psychologist
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
Evan Kleiman, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Assistant Professor
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
Yael Millgram, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Franchesca Castro-Ramirez, AM
Graduate Student
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Daniel Coppersmith, AM
Graduate Student
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Suzanne A. Bird, M.D.
Director Acute Psychiatric Services Unit
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
Ralph Buonopane, Ph.D.
Director, McLean-Franciscan Child & Adolescent Inpatient Mental Health Program
Fransciscan Children
Brighton, Massachusetts
Adam Haim, Ph.D.
Chief of the Treatment and Preventive Intervention Research Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
North Bethesda, Maryland
Jordan Smoller, MD, ScD
professor
Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
Matthew K. Nock, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Research Scientist
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Despite the importance of suicide prediction and prevention, it is among the greatest unmet challenges in mental healthcare, as prediction has not improved over 50 years of research (Franklin et al., 2017). Risk for suicide is dynamic, as suicidal urges are transient and fluctuate substantially (Kleiman et al., 2017), and there is urgent need for tools for short-term prediction of imminent risk. Healthcare professionals need to know who is at risk, why, and when through improved understanding and prediction of the temporal processes involved in suicide risk. Digital monitoring – or the gathering of intensive longitudinal, real-time mobile data – is optimally suited to serve this precision psychiatry approach to suicide prevention. However, digital monitoring of suicidal urges and behaviors presents a particular challenge in managing intensively assessed risk-related information from multiple participants, assessed multiple times per day. Additionally, given that this research moves measurement out of the lab and into daily life, participants’ locations are typically unknown. We present a detailed risk management protocol for digital monitoring suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), used and refined for four years in large, multisite studies recruiting from psychiatric emergency departments and inpatient units, for both adults and adolescents at high risk for suicide. This protocol has been used in digital monitoring studies of >900 research participants for over 4 years, with nearly 700 instances of risk alerts based on participant responses and prompting use of our high-risk procedures. We describe our staffing, training, and team-based approach to continuous risk monitoring in these studies as well as lessons learned through the use of this protocol.