Category: Couples / Close Relationships
Melissa Gates, M.S. (she/her/hers)
Doctoral Student
Binghamton University
SUNY Binghamton
Vestal, New York
Shelby Scott, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor of Psychology
The University of Texas at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas
Michael Newcomb, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Associate Professor
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois
Melissa Gates, M.S. (she/her/hers)
Doctoral Student
Binghamton University
SUNY Binghamton
Vestal, New York
Shelby Scott, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor of Psychology
The University of Texas at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas
Madison Smith, M.S., Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Postdoctoral Scholar
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois
Alexandra Long, M.A. (she/her/hers)
PhD Candidate in Clinical Psychology
American University
Washington, District of Columbia
Timothy Sullivan, M.A. (he/him/his)
Graduate Student
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York
Minority stress theory is one framework for understanding the proximal (e.g., internalized stigma) and distal stressors (e.g., experiences of prejudice, discrimination, and stigma) sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals face, in part because of their marginalized identities and relationships (Meyer, 2003). These stressors are socially constructed and exacerbated by social institutions and processes, inevitably reinforcing the marginalized group’s stigmatized societal status and chronic invalidation. To date, most research on minority stress has focused on its adverse implications for individual functioning (e.g., depression, suicidality; Pellicane & Ciesla, 2022), and more recent research has established associations between minority stress and relational functioning more broadly (Feinstein et al., 2018; Guschlbauer et al., 2019). Given these advances, it is important to decipher more nuanced associations between specific forms of minority stress (distal vs. proximal) and relationship outcomes (e.g., individual, cross-partner, and relational) among SGMs. We assert that it is particularly important to understand these phenomena across multiple types of SGM relationships— for instance, female and male same-gender couples, couples with bisexual partners, and transgender and nonbinary relationships—as the nuanced form of minority stress differs across SGM subgroups. This symposium seeks to advance the science of minority stress across a diverse array of relationship outcomes and SGM subgroups. Presentations span a variety of research methodologies, including dyadic datasets that allow for actor-partner interdependence models, observational communication studies, moderation and mediation designs, and sequential cohort studies.
To advance the science of minority stress and relationship functioning across the SGM spectrum, presenter 1 will present data from lesbian, gay, and bisexual+ couples to examine how distal (e.g., history of violence) and proximal (i.e., internalized and relationship stigma) minority stressors are related with IPV perpetration. Presenter 2 will elucidate protective (e.g., coping) and risk (e.g., discrimination) pathways from psychological distress to relationship functioning among partnered plurisexual women. Presenter 3 will present how one’s own and one’s partner’s internalized stigma and negative affect following a lab-based stressor discussion are associated with physical, psychological, and identity-specific IPV use among SGM couples. Presenter 4 will present how gender minority stress and partner affirmation, as assessed from a novel measure, are associated with IPV victimization among transgender and nonbinary individuals. Lastly, presenter 5 will present data underscoring the links between minority stress and HIV-risk behaviors (e.g., breaks in relationship agreements) among male couples. Our discussant, an expert on SGM health and the buffering role of romantic relationships, will summarize findings across studies and recommend future avenues for assessment and prevention of IPV, and discuss ways to cultivate resilience in the context of SGM relationships.